I think I can guess why you can't see any other ships though. The "42" ship is actually just an invisible ship for play testing (hmm I should probably rename it to make that clearer). In regards to not being able to buy new ships anywhere, that's really weird. To be quite honest it's not going to be anywhere close to completion in the near future. I don't think it'd be very fun at the moment since I have only created a few test missions and a maybe only 5% of the galaxy's systems. Unfortunately at this point in time, AGFFA is incomplete enough that a fresh start in the SW galaxy with one ship and a small amount of money would be unviable. I think I'll just stick with the current scale, even though it makes a Lucrehulk seem half the length of a Super Star Destroyer (which is quite clearly not the case in lore).
I ended up with the equation f(x) = 13.418x^0.742 (which I realise isn't logarithmic), which still grossly increased the Executor Dreadnought to an absurdly large size. So, I spent about an hour fiddling around with Microsoft Excel to see if I could format a logarithmic scale or something curved to decrease the size of larger ships. If I were to follow the linear scale, the Executor would be long enough to fill at least 5 computer screens in length, so there's no way I'm going with that. The Executor-class Dreadnought is part of both scales, and is quite obviously too large in the linear scale to have in-game. The image below contains two scales: the current one (where I just "eye-balled" and guessed the size of ships roughly), and a linear scale. Recently, I have been wondering whether the current ship scaling should be altered in AGFFA.
0 kommentar(er)
